While policymakers struggled to build on the Kyoto Climate Protection Conference held in 1997 - it took until the summer of 2001 to reach a compromise on the wording of the Kyoto Protocol - industry, led by the chemical sector, has already notched up significant success in the reduction of what are known as greenhouse gas emissions. Irrespective of political decision-making, protecting the climate is a top priority at Bayer. Even as we increase productivity, we are achieving far-reaching progress toward our 2010 goal of reducing by more than 50 percent compared with 1990 emissions of the two greenhouse gases carbon dioxide (CO2) and dinitrogen monoxide (N2O) at Bayer AG's plants.

The new combined cycle power plant in Dormagen reduces CO2 emissions by around 600,000 metric tons.
  At the Third Conference of the Parties in Kyoto in 1997 the industrialized nations and newly industrializing countries undertook to cut emissions of six greenhouse gases - first and foremost carbon dioxide - by 5.2 percent compared to 1990 levels by the year 2012. The EU committed itself to an eight percent reduction, while the United States intended cutting its levels by seven percent, with Japan aiming for six percent. Within the EU, Germany - as part of the burden sharing process - has entered into a particular commitment, aiming to cut national emissions of the six greenhouse gases by as much as 21 percent by 2012.
 
Kyoto 1997: Industrial and industrializing nations commit themselves to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.
Regarding the controversial question of which proportion of a nation's reduction commitments had to be met on its own territory and to what extent greenhouse gas sinks, such as forests, could be credited to a country's record, a compromise was reached in the summer of 2001 at the Bonn Conference on Climate Change. Long before Kyoto, in fact in 1992 after the Framework Convention on Climate Change in Rio de Janeiro, Bayer set the goal, in the context of sustainable development, of using as little energy as possible and, at the same time, of making major reductions in its carbon dioxide emissions. Bayer AG's emissions of carbon dioxide and dinitrogen monoxide (laughing gas) amounted to some ten million metric tons of CO2 equivalent in 1990.

We have already reduced these considerably, primarily by means of the following measures:

  • Thermal decomposition of dinitrogen monoxide at the Krefeld-Uerdingen site (reduction: approx. 4 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent per year)
  • Replacement of the coal-fired power station at the Dormagen site with a modern combined cycle power station (reduction: approx. 0.6 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent per year)
  • Conversion of our chlorine electrolysis plants at the Leverkusen, Krefeld-Uerdingen and Dormagen sites from the old mercury-cell technology to the energy-saving membrane method (reduction: approx. 0.2 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent per year).

Through these and other technical improvements we have virtually utilized all energy saving potential at our German sites with the result that we have already surpassed our self-imposed target in terms of reducing greenhouse gases, leaving little room for improvement in the coming years, especially as we expect further production increases.

Because restrictive national measures would, under certain circumstances, result in a clear deterioration in our competitive position compared with other countries, we welcome the agreement reached between the industrialized nations in Bonn in July 2001 on an internationally binding reduction of greenhouse gases in those countries.

We also welcome the introduction of flexible mechanisms. These enable a country to achieve the agreed targets by means of projects in place abroad or through trading measures. Examples of these flexible measures include emission trading, emission-lowering investments by industrialized nations in other industrialized or newly industrializing countries (joint implementation) and the support of technology transfer to developing countries that also results in a lowering of greenhouse gas emissions (clean development mechanism). This very type of technology transfer is now part of our everyday activity at Bayer as we strive to implement the same level of technological standard at each of our production sites across the world.


 
This unit separates the laughing gas generated as a by-product during the manufacture of adipic acid into nitrogen and oxygen, components of air.
 
 

With emission trading, it is important that the established system is organized to prevent a future shortage of CO2 certificates which could result in excessively high prices for additional certificates for companies that want to expand, or even impose limits on growth. Such a situation could lead to a shift in investment towards those countries that are not involved in emission trading. As a precautionary measure we are working together with the national and international chemical and industrial associations to ensure that the system for emission trading is a viable one at the company level. In its green paper on the trade in greenhouse gas emissions, the EU expects to have an intra-Community system in place with effect from 2005.

The self-commitment the chemical industry entered into in 1996 to reduce CO2 emissions has been so successful that in 2000 new, more ambitious targets were introduced. Bayer played a strong part in this success.
 

 


European Union

 

 


Carbon dioxide (CO2)
Methane (CH4)
Nitrous oxide (dinitrogen monoxide - N2O)
Partially halogenated hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Kyoto Protocol is supposed to come in force in 2002. This depends on ratification by 55 percent of the industrialized countries involved and coverage of 55 percent of the emissions to be reduced.